Architecture / June 25, 2018 /
All construction work is ultimately undertaken for the benefit of a client. Clients fund the construction process, whether they are individuals extending their homes, or a multi-national corporation developing a cutting-edge production facility, or a government department providing much needed social infrastructure. The importance of clients cannot be over-emphasized. Very often clients do not get the building they want, because they do not know how to ask for it and the architect or other consultants think the building should look a different way. Clients expect that the project will be a success and that the providers will deliver a competent service. They will be dissatisfied, if these expectations are not met.
This is where the contractor works alongside or within the design team providing a construction management service. The management contractor does not undertake either the design or the direct construction work. The physical construction is carried out by specialist subcontractors, package contractors. There are two main forms of this approach: Management Contracting where the contractor employs the subcontractors and Construction Management where the subcontractors are employed directly by the client and the project is managed by the construction manager - there is no actual main contractor. Management procurement routes are associated with fast moving, complex construction projects. The early appointment of manager within the design team allows the design and construction operations to be fast-tracked while also ensuring that the required quality standards are delivered. These projects, however, tend to be expensive. Figure 1 sets out a summary of the advantages and disadvantage of various procurement approaches which may be of use in meeting project objectives.